Evolutionary and Cognitive Science
نویسندگان
چکیده
When interpreting the actions of people from other societies from a moral point of view, we often err. Two types of errors are of particular relevance here. One consists in overestimating the similarity across cultures of the moral judgments that guide people’s actions and interactions. The other consists in underestimating this similarity. Arguably, the first kind of error is common among psychologists who, since Piaget (1932) and Kohlberg (1981), have studied the stages through which children acquire moral competencies and tried to identify basic principles and components of human morality. Although psychologists do not entirely ignore cultural diversity, they, as a matter of course, approach morality as a general human disposition and competence. The bulk of their evidence is experimental and most of their experiments are carried with Western or at least Westernized participants. Anthropologists object to these theoretical, methodological and sampling biases (Westermarck, 1906; Benedict, 1934; Shweder, Mahapatra, & Miller, 1987). Anthropological studies of morality based on participant observation in a great variety of societies show how much moral judgments can vary across cultures, casting doubt, most anthropologists think (but see Laidlaw, 2002; Lambek, 2010), on the existence of universal moral norms, or even on the very existence of morality as a universal trait of the human mind. After all, ‘morality’ might just be one of these ‘family resemblance’ category—a notion that Wittgenstein (1953) introduced and illustrated with the category of games—where items are lumped together because each resemble some of the others, without there being any characteristic trait shared by every item in the category. Still, while the richness and relevance of anthropological evidence is clear, its interpretation is not. Moreover, anthropologists’ focus on cultural differences and local idiosyncrasies may result in errors of the second type, that is, in underestimating similarity of moral judgments across cultures.
منابع مشابه
Where Evolutionary Psychology meets Cognitive Neuroscience
Cognitive neuroscience, the study of brain-behavior relationships, has long attempted to map the brain. The discipline is flourishing, with an increasing number of functional neuroimaging studies appearing in the scientific literature daily. Unlike biology and even psychology, the cognitive neurosciences have only recently begun to apply evolutionary meta-theory and methodological guidance. App...
متن کاملComputational Modeling of Teaching and Learning through Application of Evolutionary Algorithms
Within the mind, there are a myriad of ideas that make sense within the bounds of everyday experience, but are not reflective of how the world actually exists; this is particularly true in the domain of science. Classroom learning with teacher explanation are a bridge through which these naive understandings can be brought in line with scientific reality. The purpose of this paper is to examine...
متن کاملSelection Procedures for Module Discovery: Exploring Evolutionary Algorithms for Cognitive Science
Evolutionary algorithms are playing an increasingly important role as search methods in cognitive science domains. In this study, methodological issues in the use of evolutionary algorithms were investigated via simulations in which procedures were systematically varied to modify the selection pressures on populations of evolving agents. Traditional roulette wheel, tournament, and variations of...
متن کاملEvolving cognitive scaffolding and environment adaptation: a new research direction for evolutionary robotics
Many researchers in embodied cognitive science and AI, and evolutionary robotics in particular, emphasize the interaction of brain, body and environment as crucial to the emergence of intelligent, adaptive behavior. Accordingly, the interaction between agent and environment, as well as the co-adaptation of artificial brains and bodies has been the focus of much research in evolutionary robotics...
متن کاملCognitive Science, Social Theory, and Ethics
The terms in my title form an odd triple. Social theory has been largely immune from, or has ignored, cognitive science. Ethics and social theory have a long and well-grounded history of antagonism, interspersed with moments of mutual borrowing. Cognitive science and ethics have a more intense relationship. One of the main critiques of John Rawls, for example, was that he lacked an adequate mor...
متن کاملA MODEL FOR EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS OF WORDS IN A LANGUAGE
Human language, over its evolutionary history, has emerged as one of the fundamental defining characteristic of the modern man. However, this milestone evolutionary process through natural selection has not left any ’linguistic fossils’ that may enable us to trace back the actual course of development of language and its establishment in human societies. Lacking analytical tools to fathom the cr...
متن کامل